[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/30] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF routing.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 and O IA to same prefix.
2. O E2 has lower metric.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: Suboptimal OSPF. O E2 preferred over O IA due to lower metric.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E1 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF routing.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E1 and O E2 to same prefix.
2. O E1 is always preferred over O E2.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct OSPF behavior. O E1 preferred over O E2 regardless of metric.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O N2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/10] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF routing.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O N2 and O E2 to same prefix.
2. O N2 is preferred over O E2 in OSPF hierarchy.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct OSPF behavior. NSSA O N2 preferred over O E2.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O 192.168.1.0/24 [110/10] via 10.0.0.2
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/5] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF routing.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O and O E2 to same prefix.
2. Intra-area O is preferred over O E2.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct OSPF behavior. Intra-area O preferred over external O E2.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/100] via 10.0.0.2
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/100] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF routing.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Two O E2 routes with equal metric.
2. ECMP is formed.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid OSPF ECMP. Two O E2 routes with equal cost.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/10] via 10.0.0.2
O N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/20] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF default routes.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 and O N2 default routes.
2. O N2 is preferred over O E2.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct OSPF default selection. O N2 preferred over O E2.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: ASBR redistributes BGP. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 route from BGP redistribution.
2. Normal behavior for ASBR.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid O E2 route from BGP redistribution.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: ASBR redistributes RIP. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 route from RIP redistribution.
2. Normal behavior for ASBR.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid O E2 route from RIP redistribution.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/30] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Area 1 is stub. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O IA route present.
2. Stub area should not receive O IA unless default.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: O IA route in stub area. Check area type configuration.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O N2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: NSSA area missing P-bit. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O N2 route present.
2. P-bit missing means route not propagated to other areas.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: NSSA O N2 route missing P-bit. Not propagated to backbone.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E1 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/30] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Analyze OSPF routing.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E1 and O IA to same prefix.
2. O E1 is preferred over O IA.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct OSPF behavior. O E1 preferred over O IA.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Type 2 metric. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 route with type 2 metric.
2. Metric does not increase across OSPF domain.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid O E2 route with type 2 metric.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/50] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Suboptimal inter-area path. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O IA route with high metric.
2. ABR might not be optimal.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: Suboptimal O IA metric. Check ABR placement and links.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/10] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Default route from ASBR. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 default route.
2. Normal for ASBR to originate default.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid O E2 default route from ASBR.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/10] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Default route in NSSA. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O N2 default route.
2. Normal for ABR to originate default in NSSA.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid O N2 default route in NSSA area.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Missing ABR. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O IA route present.
2. ABR is functioning correctly.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: O IA route present, ABR is working.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Missing ASBR. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 route present.
2. ASBR is functioning correctly.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: O E2 route present, ASBR is working.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O N2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Missing NSSA ABR. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O N2 route present.
2. NSSA ABR is functioning.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: O N2 route present, NSSA ABR is working.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Area mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O E2 route present.
2. Area mismatch might cause suboptimal routing.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: Check area configuration for O E2 route.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Area mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. O IA route present.
2. Area mismatch might cause suboptimal routing.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: Check area configuration for O IA route.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O E2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O E2 192.168.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: ASBR redistributing multiple prefixes. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Multiple O E2 routes from same ASBR.
2. Normal behavior.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid multiple O E2 routes from ASBR.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O IA 192.168.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: ABR advertising multiple prefixes. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Multiple O IA routes from same ABR.
2. Normal behavior.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid multiple O IA routes from ABR.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O N2 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2
O N2 192.168.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: NSSA ABR advertising multiple prefixes. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Multiple O N2 routes from same ABR.
2. Normal behavior.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid multiple O N2 routes from NSSA ABR.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [200/0] via 10.0.0.2
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Context: iBGP vs eBGP. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. iBGP (AD 200) and eBGP (AD 20) to same prefix.
2. eBGP is preferred due to lower AD.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct BGP behavior. eBGP preferred over iBGP.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path loop detected in BGP table. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. AS-path loop should prevent installation.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: BGP route installed despite AS-path loop context. Check BGP config.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path prepending applied. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. AS-path prepending makes path longer, less preferred.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed with AS-path prepending. Suboptimal path.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [200/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: iBGP next-hop unreachable. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. iBGP route present.
2. Next-hop should be unreachable for iBGP without next-hop-self.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: iBGP route installed. Check next-hop reachability.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path too long. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Long AS-path might be less preferred.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed with long AS-path.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2
B 192.168.1.0/24 [200/0] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Context: eBGP vs iBGP conflict. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. eBGP and iBGP to same prefix.
2. eBGP preferred.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct BGP behavior. eBGP preferred over iBGP.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: BGP flapping. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Flapping indicates instability.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: BGP route present but context indicates flapping. Check links.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path filter blocking. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Filter should block it.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: BGP route installed despite AS-path filter. Check route-map.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Shorter AS-path preferred. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Shorter AS-path is best path.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed with optimal AS-path length.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Context: BGP multipath with different AS-paths. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Two BGP routes with same AD.
2. Multipath requires same AS-path unless configured otherwise.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: BGP multipath with different AS-paths. Check bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: BGP confederation. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Confederation might affect AS-path.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed in confederation setup.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-override applied. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. AS-override prevents loop in overlapping AS.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed with AS-override.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: allowas-in applied. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. allowas-in accepts route with own AS in path.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed with allowas-in.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path ACL mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. ACL should filter it.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: BGP route installed despite AS-path ACL. Check config.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [200/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: iBGP split horizon. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. iBGP route present.
2. Split horizon prevents re-advertisement.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: iBGP route installed. Split horizon normal.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path TE. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. TE uses AS-path prepending.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed for traffic engineering.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path limit exceeded. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Limit should drop it.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: BGP route installed despite AS-path limit. Check maxas-limit.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: AS-path mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Mismatch might cause suboptimal routing.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: BGP route installed. Check AS-path consistency.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Origin code mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Origin code (IGP, EGP, incomplete) affects preference.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed. Check origin code for preference.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Community mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Communities affect route policy.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed. Check community values.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Aggregator mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Aggregator attribute shows route aggregation.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed. Check aggregator attribute.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Atomic aggregate mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. BGP route present.
2. Atomic aggregate indicates loss of AS-path info.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: BGP route installed with atomic aggregate.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O 192.168.1.0/24 [110/10] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: EIGRP K-value mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. OSPF route present instead of EIGRP.
2. K-value mismatch prevents EIGRP adjacency.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP adjacency down due to K-value mismatch. OSPF used as backup.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
D EX 192.168.1.0/24 [170/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: EIGRP K-value correct, but redistributed. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. D EX route present.
2. External EIGRP route from redistribution.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid D EX route from redistribution.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
S 192.168.1.0/24 [1/0] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: EIGRP K-value mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Static route present instead of EIGRP.
2. K-value mismatch prevents EIGRP.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP down due to K-value mismatch. Static route used.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP adjacency flapping due to K-value. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes present.
2. Flapping prevents route installation.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to adjacency flapping from K-value mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
D 192.168.1.0/24 [90/30720] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: EIGRP K-value mismatch on another link. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. D route present.
2. Adjacency is up on this link.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: EIGRP route present. K-value mismatch only affects other link.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
D 192.168.1.0/24 [90/50000] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Suboptimal metric due to K-value. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. D route with high metric.
2. K-value mismatch might cause suboptimal path selection.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: Suboptimal EIGRP metric. Check K-values and bandwidth.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
D EX 192.168.1.0/24 [170/20] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: Redistributed from OSPF. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. D EX route present.
2. Normal for OSPF redistribution.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Valid D EX route from OSPF redistribution.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP AS mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. AS mismatch prevents adjacency.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to AS mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: Passive interface for EIGRP. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Passive interface stops hello packets.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP routes missing due to passive interface.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP stub router. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Stub router might not advertise routes.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: EIGRP routes missing due to stub configuration.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP summary leak. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Summary leak might cause issues.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP routes missing due to summary leak.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP route-map filter. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Route-map filtering routes.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP routes missing due to route-map filter.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP distribute-list. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Distribute-list filtering routes.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP routes missing due to distribute-list.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP offset-list. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Offset-list modifying metrics.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP routes missing due to offset-list.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP bandwidth constraint. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Bandwidth limit preventing adjacency.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: EIGRP routes missing due to bandwidth constraint.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP hello/hold mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Timer mismatch prevents adjacency.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to hello/hold timer mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP MTU mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. MTU mismatch preventing adjacency.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to MTU mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP auth mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Authentication mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to authentication mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP VRF mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. VRF mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to VRF mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP address family mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Address family mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to address family mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP topology base mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. Topology base mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to topology base mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP SFM mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. SFM mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to SFM mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: EIGRP NSF mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No EIGRP routes.
2. NSF mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: EIGRP routes missing due to NSF mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
O 192.168.1.0/24 [110/10] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: RIP 16 hops away. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. OSPF route present instead of RIP.
2. RIP route is 16 hops away, considered unreachable.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP route missing due to 16-hop limit. OSPF used as backup.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/16] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: RIP metric 16. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. RIP route with metric 16.
2. Metric 16 means unreachable in RIP.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP route marked unreachable with metric 16.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP default route missing. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP default route.
2. Default originate might be missing.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP default route missing. Check default-information originate.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/10] via 10.0.0.2
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/5] via 10.0.0.3

Question: Context: Suboptimal RIP hop count. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. Two RIP routes with different metrics.
2. Lower hop count (5) is preferred.
</reasoning>
<answer>
INFO: Correct RIP behavior. Lower hop count preferred.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP split horizon. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Split horizon preventing advertisement.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to split horizon.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP poison reverse. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Poison reverse marking route unreachable.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to poison reverse.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP holddown timer. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Holddown timer expired.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to holddown timer expiration.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP auth mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Authentication mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to authentication mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP version mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. RIPv1 vs RIPv2 mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to version mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP passive interface. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Passive interface stopping updates.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to passive interface.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP offset-list. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Offset-list modifying metrics.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to offset-list.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP distribute-list. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Distribute-list filtering routes.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to distribute-list.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP route-map. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Route-map filtering routes.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to route-map.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP distance limit. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Distance limit preventing installation.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to distance limit.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP summary leak. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Summary leak causing issues.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP routes missing due to summary leak.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP VRF mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. VRF mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to VRF mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP address family mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Address family mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to address family mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP topology base mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. Topology base mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to topology base mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP SFM mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. SFM mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to SFM mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0

Question: Context: RIP NSF mismatch. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. No RIP routes.
2. NSF mismatch.
</reasoning>
<answer>
CRITICAL: RIP routes missing due to NSF mismatch.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/15] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: High RIP metric. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. RIP route with metric 15.
2. Close to 16-hop limit.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP route with high metric (15). Near hop count limit.
</answer>


[System] You are a network routing expert. Analyze the routing table, detect issues, and provide step-by-step reasoning. Use the format: <reasoning>...step-by-step analysis...</reasoning><answer>...concise answer...</answer>

[User]
Routing table:
C 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, Gi0/0
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/5] via 10.0.0.2

Question: Context: RIP flapping. Analyze.

[Assistant]
<reasoning>
1. RIP route present.
2. Flapping indicates instability.
</reasoning>
<answer>
WARNING: RIP route present but context indicates flapping. Check links.
</answer>